PENGARUH FASILITAS KERJA, KOMITMEN ORGANISASI DAN BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI  NEGERI SIPIL DINAS LINGKUNGAN HIDUP, KEHUTANAN DAN PERTANAHAN PROPINSI PAPUA BARAT DAYA

Yosep  Kanan; Andi Irwan; Wa Ode  Likewati

doi:10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2067

Authors

Yosep Kanan Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong
Andi Irwan Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong
Wa Ode Likewati Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2067

Keywords:

Work Facilities, Organizational Commitment, Organizational Culture, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of work facilities, organizational commitment, and organizational culture on the performance of civil servants at the DLHKP of Southwest Papua Province. This study uses a quantitative approach with a causal associative research type. The research sample consisted of 64 civil servants determined using the census method. Data were analyzed through descriptive analysis, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, t-tests, F-tests, coefficient of determination (R²) tests, and Effective Contributions (SE) and Relative Contributions. The results of the study indicate that partially work facilities have a positive but insignificant effect on civil servant performance with a calculated t value of 1.999 and a significance of 0.050, while organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect with a calculated t value of 5.414 and a significance of <0.001. Meanwhile, organizational culture has a positive but insignificant effect on civil servant performance with a calculated t value of 1.729 and a significance of 0.089. Simultaneously, the three independent variables have a significant effect on civil servant performance with a calculated F value of 22.093 and a significance of <0.001. The coefficient of determination (R²) value of 0.525 indicates that 52.5% of the variation in civil servant performance can be explained by work facilities, organizational commitment, and organizational culture, with organizational commitment as the most dominant variable. The effective contribution (SE) to the dependent variable (Y) is obtained from the variables Organizational Commitment (X₂) of 34.1%, Organizational Culture (X₃) of 9.8%. and Work Facilities (X₁) of 8.6%. The relative contribution (SR) of Organizational Commitment (X₂) is 64.9%, followed by Organizational Culture (X₃) of 18.8%, and Work Facilities (X₁) of 16.3%.

References

Anwar, V., Irwan, A., Zaini, M. N. D. B. M., & Budi, R. (2025). Behavioral Drivers of Capital Structure and Their Impact on MSE Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. JASF: Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 8(1), 74-93.

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.

Husnan, S. (2002). Manajemen keuangan: Teori dan penerapan (Keputusan jangka panjang). BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Irwan, A., Anwar, V., & Zaitun, C. (2025). More than a paycheck: How non-financial incentives shape employee motivation in public administration. Asian Management and Business Review, 5(1), 178-195.

Irwan, A., Mahfudnurnajamuddin, M., Nujum, S., & Mangkona, S. (2020). The effect of leadership style, work motivation and organizational culture on employee performance mediated by job satisfaction. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(8), 642-657.

Irwan, A., Budi, R., Zaitun, C., Asrianto, A., & Azizurrohman, M. (2025). Antecedents and effects of empowering leadership: A regional approach to disengagement and innovation.

Irwan, A Tiong,., &. P., Adi, Y (2025). Agile Leadership, Digital Transformation, And Employee Performance: The Role Of Work Engagement. JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN BISNIS, 4(2), 600-623.

Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General systems theory: Applications for organization and management. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447–465.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PAN-RB Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil.

Kusuma, D. M. (2013). Kinerja pegawai negeri sipil (PNS) di kantor badan kepegawaian daerah Kabupaten Kutai Timur. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 1388-1400.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

Mawardi, S., Tarwijo, T., Hanis, U., & Violin, V. (2024). Implementasi motivasi kerja dalam meningkatkan kinerja pegawai. Jurnal Mirai Management, 9(1), 849–859.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 6. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2014). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Rosinta, R., & Yuliana, L. (2024). Peran insentif dan motivasi terhadap kinerja karyawan PT. KB Bank Tbk. Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 2(6), 44–52.

Sulistiyani, A. T., & Rosidah. (2003). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Graha Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.