PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN BROKER ASURANSI MENGHADAPI KETENTUAN MODAL MINIMUM PERUSAHAAN 2026

Authors

  • Robidi Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi (STMA) Trisakti
  • Agus Subrata Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi (STMA) Trisakti
  • Muhamad Ihsan Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi (STMA) Trisakti
  • Desi Roro Kiatin Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Asuransi (STMA) Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2095

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Insurance Broker, Minimum Capital Requirement, Insurance Regulation, Financial Stability

Abstract

The minimum capital requirement for insurance companies planned to be implemented in 2026 constitutes a key element of prudential regulatory reform aimed at strengthening solvency and ensuring the stability of the insurance industry. However, this policy may generate indirect yet significant implications for consumer protection mechanisms, particularly through the role of insurance brokers as independent intermediaries. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the impact of the 2026 minimum capital requirement on consumer protection as exercised through insurance brokers, while linking regulatory developments to brokers’ empirical performance conditions during the 2023–2025 period. The research employs a qualitative approach using a juridical-empirical and policy analysis framework, drawing on regulatory documents and high-quality international academic literature. The findings indicate that stricter capital requirements tend to accelerate market consolidation and narrow brokers’ operational space in product comparison, policy negotiation, and consumer assistance. Such structural pressures may weaken brokers’ substantive independence and diminish their effectiveness as consumer protection instruments. The study concludes that consumer protection in the insurance sector cannot rely solely on insurers’ financial strength but must also be supported by a regulatory framework that preserves and strengthens the role of insurance brokers through proportional and risk-based regulatory approaches.

References

Alekseenko, A. P. (2023). Model framework for consumer protection and regulation in financial markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070305

Ashraf, D., & Sunder, J. (2023). Financial intermediation, fiduciary duties, and consumer protection. Journal of Financial Regulation, 9(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjad012

Barbu, A. (2023). Ex-post loss sharing in consumer financial markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4079524

Black, J. (2023). Managing regulatory complexity. Journal of Law and Society, 50(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12409

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Eichengreen, B. (2023). Finance, regulation, and the protection of consumers in modern financial systems. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grad021

Honigsberg, C., Jackson, J., & Liu, Y. (2022). Regulatory burden and market structure in financial intermediation. Journal of Law and Economics, 65(4), 743–780. https://doi.org/10.1086/721493

Kochenburger, P., & Salve, P. (2023). An introduction to insurance regulation. In Research Handbook on Insurance Law and Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781802205893/9781802205893.xml

Napitupulu, R. H. M., Nadapdap, H. S., Maulana, W., & Pratama, S. (2025). STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN BISNIS DALAM MENGHADAPI PERSAINGAN BISNIS INSURANCE TECHNOLOGY (INSURTECH) DI INDONESIA. JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v14i1.1401

Prayetno, S., & Reimond Hasangapan Mikkael. (2025). Strategies to improve hospital implementation of management functions that influence service behavior. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i1.2790

R. Muh Deddy Hanif Sardjito, Bayu Suganda, Bagus Suhendar, Rianita Natalia Sinaga, & Reimond Hasangapan Mikkael Napitupulu. (2024). PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP UTMOST GOOD FAITH UNTUK PRODUK ASURANSI PROPERTY ALL RISK. JURNAL LENTERA BISNIS, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v13i3.1204

Shavshukov, V. M., & Zhuravleva, N. A. (2023). Financial market regulation systems and risk governance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(6), 312.

Sinaga, R. N. (2020). MANAJEMEN STRATEGI PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI. In Buku Penerbit Amerta Media.

Tica, A., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2022). How regulatory changes are driven by a need for control in reputational scandals: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(4), 542–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2020-0196

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11