EFEKTIVITAS KERJA FLEKSIBEL: WLB, DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI, DAN KOMPENSASI

Authors

  • Heni Kesumayani STIE Ganesha
  • Moh. Tahang STIE Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v15i1.2180

Keywords:

Flexible Work Arrangements, Work–Life Balance, Employee Engagement, Employee Performance, Work From Home

Abstract

The development of digital technologies and post-pandemic workplace transformations have encouraged organizations to adopt Flexible Work Arrangements (FWAs) such as remote work, hybrid work, and flexible scheduling. While FWAs are often associated with improved work–life balance and productivity, their implementation may also create challenges including blurred work boundaries, longer working hours, and compensation inequality. This study aims to develop a conceptual framework explaining the relationship between FWAs and employee performance through the mediating roles of job autonomy, work–life balance, and employee engagement, as well as the moderating roles of organizational resource support and compensation fairness. The study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach by analyzing scholarly articles from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar published between 2015 and 2026. The review indicates that FWAs can enhance employee performance when supported by adequate organizational resources and fair compensation structures. The proposed framework offers practical insights for organizations in designing effective flexible work policies in the evolving digital workplace.

References

Ainurrofiq, I., & Amir, M. T. (2023). Hybrid working and organizational culture adaptation in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 25(2), 115–126.

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Ariasari, N., Sudiro, A., & Hadiwidjojo, D. (2024). Flexible work arrangements, work autonomy, and work–life balance: Implications for employee engagement and performance. Journal of Management Development, 43(2), 145–160.

Avgoustaki, A., & Cañibano, A. (2024). Flexible work arrangements and employee performance: The role of organizational support and work design. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12506

Az-Zahra, C. (2024). Flexible working arrangement on job performance mediated by work-life balance among employees. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Perkantoran, dan Akuntansi, 5(1), 174–184.

Bagaskara, R., Wibowo, A., & Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Flexible working arrangements and employee performance in Indonesian public organizations. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 12(3), 200–212.

Barokah, R. A., Kartawan, K., Sutisna, D., & Pratminingsih, S. A. (2025). Work-life balance and its influence on organizational citizenship behavior and performance in Indonesian higher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102102

Bellini, D., Gorgoglione, M., & Torre, T. (2025). Remote work, technostress, and employee well-being in the digital workplace. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(1), 55–70.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. Handbook of Evidence-Based Management, 112–129.

Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Biggs, A. (2020). Flexible work arrangements: A systematic review and meta-analysis of their effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 345–367.

Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2023). Digital workplace and employee engagement: The role of digital collaboration technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122187

Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251

David, J., Adimasta, B., & Lataruva, E. (2025). Work-life balance: The key to employee engagement and employee performance. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 9(1), 71–82. https://journal.lifescifi.com/index.php/art/article/view/647

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426–e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236

Hidayat, S. (2025). Work-life balance and employee performance: Reviewing global perspectives. Ecotechnopreneur: Journal Economics, Technology and Entrepreneur, 4(03). https://azramedia-indonesia.azramediaindonesia.com/index.php/ecotechnopreneur/article/view/1765

Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), Article 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826

Kasperczuk, A., Ćwiąkała, M., Górka, E., Ręczajski, P., Mrzygłód, P., Frasunkiewicz, M., Darcińska-Głębocka, A., Piwnik, J., & Gardocki, G. (2025). The role of work-life balance in effective business management. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05783. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05783

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2017). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15.

Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., … van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716

Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2018). Work-life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work-life options in organizations. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12228

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peemanee, J. (2026). Compensation fairness and employee performance: The moderating role of perceived organizational justice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 37(2), 310–329.

Purba, D. E. (2024). Work autonomy and employee well-being: Evidence from Indonesian organizations. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 13(1), 1–12.

Putri, A. R. (2026). Flexible work arrangements and job autonomy in the digital workplace. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 16(1), 45–60.

Santos, G., Mendes, F., & Rodrigues, J. (2024). Flexible work arrangements and employee well-being in the post-pandemic workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 34(1), 100941.

Shalahuddin, F. F., & Ikhram, M. A. D. (2024). Pengaruh fleksibilitas kerja dan motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan work life balance sebagai variabel mediasi selama pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi, 3(3), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.21776/jki.2024.03.3.24

Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2021). Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(4), 498–518.

Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Mendez, D. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, Article 111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111552

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Susilo, D., Putranto, T. D., & Navarro, C. J. S. (2022). Remote working and employee productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(9), e10628.

Sutanto, E. M., Kurniawan, M., & Prasetyo, Y. T. (2024). Work–life balance, employee engagement, and employee performance: Evidence from Indonesian organizations. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 26(1), 22–34.

Syabani, A., Nugroho, Y., & Pratama, R. (2025). Flexibility and autonomy in gig economy work: Evidence from ride-hailing drivers in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 18(1), 85–103.

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290

Wong, K., Chan, A. H. S., & Teh, P.-L. (2020). How is work–life balance arrangement associated with organisational performance? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), Article 4446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124446

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28